The true story of the false Great Monarch (these texts posted on The Catholic Forum by "Origenius", a member of the forum who seems to have a very close relationship with Jean Robin...)
Originally translated from the following website - http://textesjeanrobin.blogspot.com/
________________________________________________________________
René Guénon, in The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times (chapter. XXXVII), mentioned the "deception of prophecies" and their danger, increased by the dissolving psychic influences they convey:
"One cannot believe, for example, how many people have been seriously, and sometimes irremediably, unbalanced by the many predictions that speak of the "Great Pope" and the "Great Monarch", and which nevertheless contain some traces of certain truths, but strangely distorted by the "mirrors" of the lower psyche and, moreover, reduced to the measure of the mentality of the "seers" who have somehow "materialized" them and more or less closely "localized" to bring them into the framework of their preconceived ideas".
And Guénon added that the distortion of these truths "lends itself to exploitation "upside down" in the sense of subversion".
It is only to convince himself to listen to the "Voix d'en Bas" of which the unfortunate Léon Bloy became the tortured medium:
"Conclifed a novel by Wells, "When the Sleeper Wakes Up". It is the artifice known from a dreamy novel. But, because of the great intellectual value of the author, there is something more than a game of imagination. There is the universal premonition of a Character waking up from a long sleep, that is to say finally obtaining his mandate and thus suddenly finding himself master of the world. How many times have I thought about it?" (The Invendable, February 26, 1906.)
Hence this haunting question formulated in The Salvation by the Jews:
"When will he come, the One who must come and who was under Napoleon, only foresee by the universal trembling of the peoples?
He will come for God or against God, we don't know."
We will always be surprised that this ontological misunderstanding, which no "poetic fury" can excuse, did not make the Catholic admirers of the "Ingrateful Begar" retreat in fear, whose verbal imprudence leaves no doubt about the source of his inspiration:
"He is so much the Enemy, so identical to this LUCIFER who was named Prince of Darkness, that it is almost impossible - even in the beatific ecstasy - to separate them...
"Let him who can understand understand."
We understand too well for our part that Bloy's "Consolator in Exile" is not Catholic! In fact, if we except a totally apocryphal attribution to Saint Augustine (betrayed by crude anachronisms) and manipulations of non-ovident texts of which, among others, Saint Remy himself was a victim, it is to Nostradamus that we must attribute the authorship of this "prophetic" current that would dangerously pollute the imagination of gullible and forgetful Catholics of the "discernement of spirits".
As if by chance, Nostradamus received part of his inspiration during trips to Lorraine, Alsace and Germany, where the most suspicious pseudo-"hermetic" communities multiplied, whose exchanges with England would soon "crystallize" into an anti-Catholic international attached in particular to destroying what remained of the Holy Empire.
If we know that the "Lost King" ("poetic" designation of the expected Great Monarch) is supposed to reign over a territory extended to the limits of the old Roman Empire, we will understand that the fraudulent recovery of the Imperial Idea is part of this inverted symbolism that constitutes the framework of the "grand monarchist" gesture.
Because the function of the true eschatological Imperator - here "rangled" and closely "localized", as Guénon said, by an "expansionist" king of France - actually concerns the entire planet. Therefore, the false resurrection of an entity that was, in Antiquity with the Roman Empire, or in the Middle Ages with the Holy Roman Empire (much more Germanic than Roman by the way...) that a very partial and very imperfect prefiguration of the Emperium of the End of Time, is indeed the result of a deadly literalism. With all that this implies in the sense of this "reverse" exploitation denounced by Guénon.
We should know this since sinister necromants, heirs in their own way to the "inspirations of Nostradamus", evoked the grimacing specter of a defunct Empire. And unfortunately it must be noted that some let themselves be abused by this diabolical inversion embodied by these "Golem" who were Mussolini and especially Hitler. Blindness that raises a legitimate concern about the reaction of their descendants - we mean of course: those who belong to the same "family of spirit" - in the face of an even more formidable "seduction" since it will target souls.
This is a new reason to look at the beginnings of this perversion of the Imperial Idea that will come...to torn the Great Monarch.
As Nostradamus pergreed to Germany, the memory and influence of the very disturbing Cornelius Agrippa de Nettesheim (1486-1533) - author of the famous Occult Philosophy - are perpetuated by these "Communities of Magi" that he had founded in 1506. Himself being the disciple of Trithemus (1462-1516), a deviant Benedictine who began to very significantly pervert this legend of the Franks that was discussed here some time ago. (Mythical History of France).
Moreover, his Treatise on Second Causes presents disturbing analogies with the "philosophy" of the Nostradamic Centuries. Jean Trithème was in fact very representative of the climate of intense "occulto-humanist" effervescence where pseudo-universalism (and authentic syncretism!) was already sprising. Uniting for the worst: Judaism, Christianity and "paganism".
Paracelsus (1493-1541), another student of Trithemus, was still in this world at the time when Nostradamus was traveling to Germany, and perhaps he remembered that this unorthodox therapist had, like him, studied medicine in Montpellier.
However, Paracelsus - whose real name is Theophrast Bombast von Hohenheim - did not disdain to predict, referring among other things to a hidden treasure "between France and Spain" (also at Nostradamus, a treasure is associated with the Great Monarch), and announcing for the end of time the arrival of a very problematic "Midnight Lion", which was not in risked to be confused with the "Lion of Judah".
In a word, Nostradamus was in a country of knowledge in this Germany over which the great shadow of the perverted Imperial Idea was beginning to spread, which would one day incarnate in the Third Reich... waiting for worse.
And yet we did not say anything about the sulphurous doctor Faust (1480-1550), an emblematic figure of the great trends of the time, of whom Goethe, for his part, did not seem to doubt that he had known Nostradamus.
Still on the trail of the Great Monarch, we will remember the stay of Michel de Nostredame at the Ardennes Abbey of Orval, located in present-day Belgian Luxembourg and made famous in grand-monarchist circles by the "Prophecy of Orval" disclosed during the Revolution in a circle of French emigrants.
An investigation conducted by the archbishopric of Bordeaux, following a condemnation of the alleged prophecy by the bishop of Verdun, made it possible to establish that the text dated from the first half of the sixteenth century (century that also saw the manufacture of false prophecies attributed to respectable - even holy characters), and was therefore a few years prior to the Centuries of Nostradamus.
Their common reference to the Great Monarch, this "young prince" leaving the "island of captivity", makes Michel de Nostredame's stay in Orval all the more suspicious.
The latter, consciously or not, seemed to transform into a barely veiled "666" (the "number of the beast" in the Apocalypse), the mysterious "515" expected by Dante, the "cinquecento diece e cinque, messo di dio...", the eschatological Imperator "sent by God, who will kill the Raptor and the giant who fornicates with it" (Purgatory, XXXIII, 43-45).
In the Divine Comedy, on the contrary, these two numbers directly oppose each other, just like the Veltro (the Greyhound), another designation of 515, is opposed to the wolf, ancient symbol of Rome, but whose dark side assimilates it here to the apocalyptic beast. (cf. René Guénon, Dante's Esotericism).
Virgil, for his part, had made "666" the "number of Caesar", but it was in this case the beneficial aspect of this solar number which, like any symbol, is ambivalent. This is why according to Saint Hippolyte, the Messiah and the Antichrist both have the lion as an emblem, another solar symbol.
But with Nostradamus, it is the evil aspect of the "666" that is about. For, as we have said, the story of the Great Monarch is only the parody and "re-enseling" to the dimensions of French royalty, of a universal theme, that of the precursor who will announce the true Holy Empire, the Kingdom of God on earth, and will thus play analogically with regard to the glorious Christ, the role of Saint John the Baptist with regard to Jesus of Nazareth.
Because: "Elie comes and he will restore everything. However, I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they have not recognized him... Then the disciples understood that he had spoken to them about John the Baptist." (Saint Matthew, 17, 11-13).
However, as Jacques Thomas (The symbolic meaning of the Visitation) points out, "' eth ' Eliâh hanâbî'" (Eliah the Prophet) is worth 515 in simple value, [according to the Guématria, science of the value of letters], which relates it to Shaddaï (Almighty)."
But for now, we have not yet finished, alas, with the "666" and its precursors. Beyond his Germanic wanderings, it is in another terroir full of imperial reminiscences - Provence - that Nostradamus drew most of his inspiration. For the anecdote, the region and its history was very suitable to envelop the dark message of the "Mage de Salon" (of Provence...) with a captivating poetry And, poetry for poetry, his current commentators would be well...inspired to listen to Toulet's warning:
"In Arles where are the Aliscamps
When the shadow is red under the roses
And clear the weather
Take care of the sweetness of things."
The ancient Roman Province, so dear to the "good King René" of which we are going to talk again, is indeed omnipresent in the Centuries and the acronym D M (Diis Manibus, "consecrated to the Gods Mans"), is a key to the prophecies, in which the discovery of the tomb of a "Great Roman" is also of decisive importance, concurrently with that of a "treasure".
This theme of the grave and the treasure, we will not be surprised, was recovered by the mystagogues of Rennes-le-Château, another high place of the "great monarchy" that we will also talk about.
That being said, just as the Great Monarch is only the shadow of a completely different character, it is also possible to think that this fraudulent exploitation of imperial symbols testifies, on the contrary, to the permanence of the true Imperium, "overhanging" from the sky of the Platonic archetypes our twilight history.
As for the Nostradamico-integrist Great Monarch, he will have to be content to complete in a way the subversive policy of certain kings of France, such as Philip the Fair or Francis I, whose aims, moreover more imperialist "than imperial", testified - by this arrogant usurpation and desecration of the eschatological function of France - to their incomprehension of the designs of Providence.
As there is nothing new under the sun of Satan, this "politicization", this paradoxical idolatry of the temporal that today characterizes the great monarchist fundamentalists, alleged guardians of the religious Dogma, is judged in this passage of the Old Testament that should be recalled:
"All the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel in Rama. They said to him, "Now you are old, and your sons do not walk in your footsteps; therefore, let us establish a king to judge us, as all nations have."
"This language displeased Samuel, because they said: Give us a king to judge us"; and Samuel prayed Jehovah. Jehovah said to Samuel:
"Listen to the voice of the people in all that they will say to you; for it is not you that they reject, it is me, that I no longer rule over them. As they have always acted towards me from the day I brought them up from Egypt until now, abandoning me to serve other gods, so they act towards you. And now, listen to their voice; but testify against them, and let them know how the king who will rule over them will treat them. (Ist Book of Samuel, 8, 4-9)
To measure the abyss that separates the Great Monarch from fundamentalist chapels, great fender of Muslims and "converter" of Jews before the Lord, of the "515", of the Dantesque Veltro, herald of catholicism in the true sense of the word, let's examine an illuminated manuscript of the Book of the Heart of Love in Love (National Library of Vienna), written by René d'Anjou, the "good King René" just mentioned.
In this manuscript, a miniature represents the symbolic figure of Amor, whose dress is adorned with a wide gold embroidered braid on which it is read in neski characters (specifically Persian calligraphy):
"The tenth day of the month of Moharem", the first day of the year of the Shiite Persians, who mourn the death of Ali, the son-in-law of the Prophet, and his two sons Hussein and Hassan. It also happens that the figure of the Mahdi, the "well directed", who is none other than the Islamic identity of the Veltro, is very present in Shiism, where he is also expected as the "hidden Imam".
What more convincing testimony can we wish for, relations between true Islamic and Christian spirituals, beyond the oppositions and conflicts whose memory secular history retains alone. We are here at the heart of the providential economy... and at the antipodes of this pseudo-Divine Mission of France reviewed and corrected by the Marquis de la Franquerie, who describes its "apotheosis" as follows:
"It will be given to the Great King, announced by so many prophecies, to assume its triumph by the last crusade that will forever destroy the sect of Muhammad and liberate the Holy Places, "where, after a most glorious reign, he will go to Jerusalem, on the Mount of Olives to deposit his Crown and his Scepter."
Certainly, the "prophecies" had not...foreseen the new political context, but the fundamentalists, which were still very hostile to Judaism, have found since the Algerian war affinities with the Sionists, so much so that the enemies of my enemies are always more or less my friends...
Let's also add that on the Muslim side, there is no shortage of caricatures either (we would have suspected it!), and that the Mahdi is intended in the eyes of some fundamentalists, to make Islam triumph over the smoking ruins of other religions.
This is probably why, for all those to whom the truth will always seem too high, a hadith professes "that there is only Mahdi Jesus son of Mary". Another way, in short, not to throw the pearls at the pigs, and to prevent the anticipated betrayal of an envoy of Allah.
As for the Zionists, who show the same ignorance towards Judaism as the radical Islamists towards Islam, they will be reminded with Emmanuel Lévyne (Judaism against Zionism) that "the State of Israel, by declaring itself sovereign, has dethroned the Eternal."
"For thus says the Lord:
"It is free that you have been delivered, and it is not with money that you will be delivered." (Isaiah, 52, 3).
And again: "I will save them by the Lord, their God, and I will not save them by the bow, nor by the sword, nor by the fights, nor by the horses, nor by the riders." (Osea, 1, 7)
In fact, the Talmud is unequivocal, which affirms on page 111a of the Ketoubote treaty, that God has made Israel take several oaths, in particular not to revolt against the nations and not to return collectively and by violence to Palestine before the coming of the Messiah, and that any transgression of these oaths would cause terrible catastrophes, exterminations and massacres.
At the same time, the Sionists have forgotten, if they have ever known, that there are two lands of Israel, as recalled by Chief Rabbi Jonathan Eybeschütz (1690-1764):
"[...] there is the land of Israel from above and there is the land of Israel from below. The first is called "adama", the second is called "eretz". The Holy Land is the heavenly Land where there is the divine palace from which the sources of wisdom spread. It is this spiritual earth that was promised and given to our ancestors and not the material earth."
And Jews faithful to their tradition also know what the future receptacle is, precisely, of this spiritual land: France, which they call Tsarfat. It was also the name of a Phoenician city - the current Sarafand - established on a promontory south of Sidon, and which the usual bibles call Sarepta. The prophet Elijah was housed there by a widow whose son he resurrected, and to whom he promised that he would not lack flour and oil until the end of the drought. (I Kings, 17, 7-24).
This flour is undoubtedly identical to the one Christ said (Matthew, 13:33):
"The Kingdom of God is like leaven that a woman took and put in three measures of flour until the dough is all raised."
But this apotheosis has a price: Tsarfat is also associated by etymology with the idea of crucible (tsarphit) and the verb tsaraph: melt, refine, experience and purify by fire.
Only this alchemical transmutation can make it this receptacle of the Messianic Glory, which is the exact opposite of the "kingdom of the Great Monarch"...
This is why, like their Christian and Muslim brothers, the enlightened Jews are waiting for the Precursor of the Messiah son of David, the 515 or the Mahdi, whom they name the "Great Prophet". He will return "in the spirit of Moses" - present, let's not forget, during the Transfiguration of Christ - and around him "will gather (yiqehath) the peoples", yiqehath having a numerical value of 515, as Jacques Thomas still reminds...
Already, this common expectation, the result of their recognition of Catholicity stricto sensu, allows all the sons of the Promise to cohabit fraternally, where modern ideologies would command them to fight each other. As written by Ruth Blau, the worthy wife of Rav Amram Blau, of holy memory:
"The analysis that the Sionists make of the Arabs is an aberration for an Orthodox Jew who, like my husband, was born in the old city of Jerusalem at the beginning of the century. [...] The Arabs have been transformed into a kind of universal enemy of the Jewish people, said Rav Amram. This is completely false. Jews and Arabs lived in peace side by side until the English, then the Sionists judged that it was in their interest to sow discord."
(Cited by Yakov M. Rabkin, In the name of the Torah. A history of Jewish opposition to Sionism.)
That this discord, in general, is the fact, not of religions, as is the way to say, but of their incomprehension, and their transgression, it clearly results, and we will never repeat it enough, from the function of this "Consolator", of this precursor of the glorious Christ that they all await, and who will call for their fusion without confusion in the saving ark of Catholicity.
And in this regard, if the "good King René" has already edified us, by manuscript interposed on Islamic-Christian relations "at the top", in this 15th century still devoted to "religious obscurantism" by modern ideology, we remains to know that this high character was a member of the Order of Fidelity founded by his great-uncle, an Order whose emblem was... a greyhound.
Obviously a continuator of the Faithful of Love dear to Dante, René d'Anjou was therefore also waiting for the Veltro announced by the author of the Divine Comedy... and by the Old Testament, since the Great Prophet is foreshadowed under this same symbolic identity. We want to talk about Caleb - which means "dog" - the only one of the twelve scouts sent by Moses to believe the conquest of the Promised Land is possible. (Numbers, 13, 30)
Let us add that the key to this promised Land was Jericho (Joshua, 2, 1-24), residence of Rahab the "prostitute" - whose tradition makes the wife of Joshua, himself a figure of the Messiah. Rahab is also one of the four women mentioned in the genealogy of Christ with Bathsheba, Thamar the Canaanite and Ruth the Moabite. (Saint Matthew, 1, 5; cf 3 and 6.)
The two spies of Israel sent by Joshua and sheltered by Rahab evoke the two witnesses, the two olive trees that will come before the end of time in the spirit of Elijah and Enoch (Zechariah, 4, 2-3; Apocalypse, 11), and who are precisely the "inspirers" of the "Lord of the Earth", that is to say the Great Prophet, the Mahdi (the "Well Directed"...), the "515" or the Veltro.
Let us remember once again that during the Transfiguration, Elijah and Moses talk to Christ on the mountain (Saint Matthew, 17:1-9), and that Peter, in this eschatological context, prophesies conciliar universalism, itself open to Catholicity, by addressing Jesus in these terms: "Lord, it is good for us to be here; if you want, I will set up three tents, one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah."
It is the two witnesses who suggest that Rahab hang a red thread from his window, a sign of gratitude for the Hebrews when they enter the city (Joshua, 2, 18-21). Common thread that appears as the "way of the Lord". This is why the Song of Songs compares the lips of the Fiancé waiting for the Bridegroom to a "scarlet thread", under the sign of a number that has become familiar to us since:
"As a young man marries a virgin, your builder will marry you... You will be called Désiré (derûshâh = 515)." (Isaiah, 62, 5 and 11-12.)
This thread, this axis, is of course closely associated with the ideas of justice and righteousness, and therefore with the image of God. "For YHVH is right, yâshâr." (Psalms, 92, 16.)
It is to this rectitude (hâyâshâr = 515) that the conversion of the "non-right" soul (lo'- yâshrâla) (Habakkuk, 2, 4) leads and which must become the image of God again. (Cf. Jacques Thomas, Op.cit)
Let's recap this symbolic constellation: a "prostitute" wife of a messianic character, a red thread giving access to the Holy Land. This is a strange prefiguration of the dark mysteries of Rennes-the castle, to which Dan Brown gave a planetary publicity, and which indeed present themselves as the inversion, the grimacing caricature of the biblical "archetype", just like the Great Monarch rudely parodies 515.
The common thread, here, will of course be the meridian of Paris, whose materialization everyone can see in the Saint-Sulpice church, which serves as a setting for many literary "desecrations". As for the supposed marriage of Rahab and Joshua, it finds its blasphemous reflection in the alleged marriages of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, another famous "sinner", omnipresent in Rennes-le-Château, where she was forced to play, in this "anti-Jericho", key to the Promised Land of Satan, a role analogously inverse to that of Rahab.
Because it is for the moment, to a cursed land that the red thread of the meridian gives access, which passes properly in the immediate vicinity of Rennes-le-Château, in the Aude, a perverted high place, but ultimately destined to regain its eschatological function.
Because, as René Guénon explains in The Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times:
"Sacred geography [...] is like any other traditional science of contingent order, likely to be diverted from its legitimate use and applied "rewasth": if a point is "privileged" to serve the emission and direction of psychic influences when these are the vehicle of a spiritual action, it will not be less when these same psychic influences are used in a completely different way and for purposes contrary to all spirituality."
This is the key to the Rennes-le-Château "case".
And we may begin to understand that the success of the provocative nonsense of the Da Vinci Code is not due to the literary quality of this station novel, but to a pre-eschatological "climate" and the deleterious "inspirations" that accompany it, in the shadow of France's true mission.
But we already hear some grand monarchists shouting:
"Our "Lost King" has nothing to do with the gnostic-occulto-Jewish-Masonic descendant of the "lineage" allegedly from Christ. If there is counterfeiting, it is the "true" Grand Monarch, ours, Catholic and French always, who is the victim!"
A first answer refers back to back "true" and "false" Great Monarch: How would it be possible, in any case, that a king goes back to the end of time on the throne of France, since precisely, in the end, no one other than the glorious Christ could take possession of his Kingdom - the kings having been until then only his lieutenants.
This is what Joan of Arc says to Charles VII: "Dear lord, I come from the King of Heaven, who is true King of France."
Statement so embarrassing for the great monarchists that the mystagogues of Rennes-le-Château exalted by Dan Brown have, as usual, roughly rigged and truncated this message, thus making the Maid the ambassador of the "Lost King" unfortunately found...
In truth, if 515, the Veltro, leads to the Good Shepherd the "single herd" gathered from the four corners of the earth, France, the ultimate Holy Land, epicenter of the eschatological earthquake, is devolved to the only Lord during his Second Advent.
And it is probably here that we must question this "Great Pope", who often accompanies the Great Monarch in the "prophecies", to sketch a caricature of "ceasar-papism"...
The only "Grand Pope" and "Great Monarch" associated that Christianity can recognize reigned a thousand years ago: we are talking about Sylvester II (Gerbert d'Aurillac) consecrated in St. Peter's Basilica on Palm Sunday 999, and his student Otto III, "the Wonder of the World".
New proof that there is no chemically pure error, but only betrayed, disfigured truths.
That said, in the reverse perspective of the great monarchists, to whom can correspond the Great Pope whose ways the Great Monarch would smooth, if not to... the Antichrist himself!
Notice to all the Sedevacantists who replace the Holy Spirit and despise the promises of Christ (thus meeting unexpectedly with the Protestants...) to "depose" the pope even when he governs the boat of Peter off these Symplegadesque are the two pitfalls of modernist dissolution and integralist petrification...
Have they forgotten that during the Transfiguration, Peter "was still talking, when a luminous cloud took them under his shadow, and a voice said, of the cloud: "This is my beloved Son; he has all my love: listen to him."
Peter will indeed not stop speaking in spirit and truth until the glorious return of Christ "on the cloud". Is it clear?
To all those who will again be outraged that we can assimilate the Great Pope to the Antichrist, we will recall a major peculiarity of the diabolical eschatology that concerns them all the more since it also explains the presence in the scenario of two Great Monarchs apparently opposed and who could not least apparently justify in the eyes of the ignorant the claims of the fundamentalists to hold the truth, in the face of an error a little too provocative, precisely.
It is therefore true that to better smooth the paths of the Prince of the Lie, the Power of Darkness has provided for two Great Monarchs, themselves associated with what we will gladly call a double relaxation trap.
What is it to say? The Apocalypse of St. John presents us with two main diabolical figures: the Antichrist and, before him, the Prostitute, the Woman dressed in purple and scarlet who "intoxicates the merchants of the earth" (does that mean nothing to you?), and who is finally annihilated by the Beast who carries her (Apocalypse, 17, 1-18.)
We should not look elsewhere for the origin of the "Divine Femine" so dear to Dan Brown, his predecessors and his epigones.
Thus, in a book entitled Le Dernier Secret de Nostradamus, Guy Tarade and Alexandra Schreyer await "the return of the cosmic woman" - inversion of Marie co-redemptor - because: "At the end of this millennium [and at the very beginning of the next] it is the goddess, the female polarity, the energy in essence, the divine dynamism that will ask to be manifested."
Hence the blasphemous "rehabilitation" of Marie-Madeleine (as if Catholics had never disdained her!) And his marriage to Jesus (but then he is no longer the Son of God?!) To found this line (but then how important does it matter?!) "Sacred blood", "real blood" or "sangraal" (follow my gaze...)
In this diabolical "montage" intended to abuse the naive - to use an understatement - the "Great Monarch of the Gnosis", knight-servant of the Prostitute, will allow the "true" Great Monarch, after this "henaurme" provocation, as Flaubert would have said, to pass at low cost for the "liberator" and the restorer of all the false values that we want! He who will actually be the precursor of the Great Pope-Antichrist...
And to say that this scenario worthy of the fairgrounds of yesteryear, with their "baron", their valoy, has been before our eyes for 2000 years, thanks to Saint John!
To those who still have not understood, let us charitablely explain that if the Prostitute, after having played her role, is killed by the Beast who carries her, it is good that the same Lie gives birth to this two-headed hydra that embodies the Scarlet Woman and the Antichrist, and therefore, bis repetita place, the two Great Monarchs who are respectively associated with them.
To deepen this fictitious antagonism, and perhaps allow them to broaden their horizon, to open it to unsuspected dimensions, we will advise the great monarchists to take an interest in the "extraterrestrial religion" which for decades has been "revisiting" sacred texts by making God and angels our "brothers of space"... or false brothers!
Because here too, as strange as it is, we are told in length, width and across, of the antagonism between "beings of light" (Big Blonds, Venusians, etc.) watching over our "evolution" (by the way, it seems that some fundamentalists have converted to evolutionism!), and evil entities: Petits Gris, Reptilians and other "aliens" with the "insectoid" aspect.
However, the latter resemble the "losters" coming out of the Well of the Abyss in the Apocalypse of St. John.
We will still not insult the grand monarchists to explain to them which of the two great acts of this tragicomedy, to which of the two phases of the double relaxation trap, these Grand Blonds and these Petits Gris must be associated respectively!
Let's admit that when Divine Mercy gives us the key...to the Well of the Abyss, it becomes really difficult to confuse fallen angels and angels of light.
To illustrate this link between the grand monarchist legend and extraterrestrial mythology, we will summarize a book put in 1973 and entitled The Fabulous Race. Its author, Gérard de Sède, also popularizer of the Rennes-le-Château affair, collected the words of a certain (or an uncertain) "marquis of B." who also, in his own way, would prove to be a precursor...
According, therefore, to this herald of the neo-Merovingian doctrine consubstantial to the mysteries of the Razès (the region of Rennes-le-Château), the Franks were a long time ago Aryas of probably Caucasian origin who, after invading India in the 20th century before Christ, would have found themselves in Asia Minor. Some - the Hittheans of the Bible or the Hittites of archaeology - remained there until the 13th century BC, while others - the Hyksos (training other peoples including the Habirous or Hebrews) - invaded northern Egypt where their King-Pastors reigned for more than three centuries.
First unfortunate clue these Hyksos were worshipers of Set the evil god with the donkey head, murderer of Osiris, and they restored his cult in their capital, Avaris. Far from being able to be associated with the Hebrews as we would like to believe, they played in Egypt a role exactly the opposite of theirs.
Second worrying clue: "The most recent discoveries have shown that the Habirous were originally an Indo-European and non-Semitic tribe. [...] The mixing of the Habirous with the Semites, especially Arabs, will only take place later, at the time of the Exodus."
This was also the opinion of the famous racist theorist Vacher de Lapouge, according to whom the Jews were a bastard race, the result of the mixture of "dolicho-blond" invaders with the natives occupying Palestine. But let's take back the thread of these very suspicious migrations.
Still to believe the "marquis of B." faithfully relayed by de Sède (who probably saw in all this only a singular story to tell, without compromising himself), other Aryas, under the name of Pelasges, founded the first Troy.
The legendary war sung by Homer was also an opportunity for a host of peoples of Asia Minor to fly to the rescue of the inhabitants of Ilion. However, among these allies of circumstance were other Pelasians, the Phrygians.
Following "historical-legendary" episodes of which we will spare Internet users the detail, these Phrygians, mixed with the rest of the Trojans, finally won Greece. Some remained there while others continued their wandering to Italy. "This migration forms the theme of the Aeneid".
Still others, after giving the region between the Sava and Danube, where today stands Belgrade, the name of "Francochorium" or Country of the Franks, melted further north the future Budapest, which they named Sicambria.
In a latent revolt against Rome, some remained there for three centuries while others marched towards Germany, then passed the Rhine. But towards the first century BC, the Phrygians of Greece and Italy had joined them in Germany.
And then above all, some of the "Habirous/Hebrews" whose destiny had been inextricably linked to that of the "Setian" Hyksos (see above), had in turn mixed with these Phrygo-pelasgic peoples founding Troy.
And that's where things get really "interesting".
Not content with having implicitly associated the Hebrews with the god with the donkey's head, through the "Setian" hyksos, the Marquis of B. makes Cain their "prototype"...
What is it about in all this if not a meticulous "demonization" of the Hebrews, under the guise of glorifying them!
And to whom could such a provocative message be addressed, if not to the supporters of the "true" Great Monarch, that their possible Sionist sympathies do not prevent (on the contrary...) from preserving a solid background of "religious" anti-Judaism.
And in this regard, they should feel targeted by these words of Abraham Abulafia, the great Kabbalist of the thirteenth century, who, after having recounted his confidential conversations with Christians, and their perfect agreement on the interpretation of the Bible, concludes that they belonged to the category of "pious men" among the kind, "and that we do not need to be careful with the words of fools in any religion [...]"
(Cited by Gershom G. Sholem, The Great Currents of Jewish Mysticism.)
This is unfortunately what the great misery of the times forces us to do!
Because all these "picturesque" stories make us measure once again, in reality, the imminence of the "grand monarchist" danger.
In fact, we did not get lost on the way, by "accompanying" the migrations doctly told by the Marquis de B, and of which here is the last step, which also constitutes, from another point of view, the "missing link": Before "the institution of Jewish royalty, that is to say before the 11th century BC, a part of the tribe that would later found this kingship in the person of Saul, the tribe of Benjamin, was banied from Israel and had to expatriate."
We recognize here the "claw" of the neo-Merovingian forgers, because in reality the Benjaminites chased by a coalition of the other tribes of Israel, and reduced to 600 men, did not expatriate at all, but reconstituted the tribe (Juges, 20, 47; 21, 10-14 and 19-23.)
But in the mind, or rather in the ulterior motives of our "historians", the tribe of Benjamin, "having a royal vocation", was ipso facto one of the cornerstones of deception.
"Ideal" ancestor of the Merovingian dynasty (before it inherits in recent years from the "real blood" of Jesus...) it was imperative to integrate it into these Hebrew migrations of which all the grand monarchists, whatever their "suitor", explain to us the journey to Gaul.
All the grand monarchists? But of course!
Again, it would be very wrong not to see the relationship between these different variations embroidered on the same theme, or rather, as we said, on a single lie that is ultimately based on the crude materialization of what must be understood according to the Spirit. However, the Gospel tells us that if it vivifies, the letter kills. And it is indeed deadly literalism that all this is about.
In this regard, as in many others, the Marquis de la Franquerie, eminent representative of the "Orthodox" fringe (!) of the great monarchism, paved the way for the Marquis de B, herald of the "Great Monarch of the Gnosis"... Convinced that "the race of our Kings is none other than that of David", the Marquis of the Frankery (op. cit.) takes up the "abracadabrantesque" theories according to which the Franks and the Celts of the "Aryano-Semitic" race, come "from the mixture of the Hebrew Semitic tribes of Palestine, the Judaites and the Danites, the tribe of Judah and Dan [...].
"The Aryan tribes would descend from Gomer, eldest son of Japhet [...] These tribes would be the Gomarians, the Phrygians, the Trojans and the Seythes [...]
"Then we follow the long migration of the Phrygians-Trojans from the Trojan kingdom to the northeast of Gaul [...]"
And this is how, according to a certain Michaël Faramersalve, taken up by the Marquis de la Franquerie: "All the Kings of France form only one race that is truly from the race of Judah and David, through the Trojan Family."
Finally, on the "historical" level, the only difference between the "neo-gnostics" and the fundamentalists lies in this that the former are much more eye-eyeing about the purity of the race, since they reject as usurpers the dynasties later to the Merovingians!!
As we have rightly said in another context, this crude literalism opposes in a way the "covenant of blood" to the "Blood of the Covenant" which was spread outside during the Passion of Christ so that everyone could participate in it. (Cf. Epistle to the Hebrews, 10,19.)
On the contrary, the myth of blood and race dear to the two grand monarchist "families", takes us very far, or rather very low, in the kingdom of the Lie, as we will see. Because it is high time to get to the true reason for our exegesis of the Fabulous Race.
To tell the truth, it is enough to justify our initial statement to quote the subtitle of the book: "Extraterrestrials and Merovingian mythology".
This is how the story of the Marquis de B ends.
"- If the "sacred blood" of the Merovingians, which their hereditary genetic marks made tangible, came from these "high ancestors", of the Vedic Marous, the Tibetan Droga, the biblical Nephillim whose name means "the Fallen", the Phrygian Phryxos son of the cloud Nephele, of these ancestors whose various names do not matter since their trace is also found in the name of the "Franks of the clouds", the Franci nebulones or Niebelungen, fallen from the sky in the swampy lands, like the toads [emblem of the Merovingians], in short if this blood testified to a very ancient crossing with a species whose evolution had begun on another planet and had continued for some time on ours, so as amazing as it seems, DESCENDANTS OF EXTRA-TERRESTRIALS ONCE REIGNED OVER FRANCE.
"This blood of which they did not know the origin but whose fascination they suffered, this blood of which they could never - and for good reason - avail themselves, we understand that kings whose throne rested on usurpation have lived in the haunting fear of seeing it reappear in the person of a Lost King."
Once again, don't cry out by finding the joke a little strong and by declaring ourselves totally immune to this kind of delirium. First, we give only very limited credit to the discernment of people who, by their own admission, are unable to distinguish between Dan Brown and Guénon!
Secondly, a certain "traditionalist" public (far from the true traditional spirit) has long been manifesting a guilty complacency towards a phenomenon which, to put it quickly, does not concern the humanities of beyond space, but the fallen angels and their allies of the soul or psychic world, intermediate between the Spirit and the body in the Pauline "trichotomism", and which constitutes by "excellence" the domain of diabolical prestiges, when it is not sanctified. (Cf. I Epistles to the Thessalonians, 5, 23.)
Because always according to Saint Paul: "The psychic man does not perceive what is of the Spirit of God; indeed, it is a folly for him and he cannot have the gnosis, because it must be discerned spiritually [...]" (I Corinthians, 2, 14-15)
Affirmation to which St. Jude echoes, speaking of the men of the last times: "It is they who create divisions, these psyches who do not have the Spirit." (3,19)
A desolating example, among many others, of this confusion of the diabolical psychic and the spiritual, exposing us to fall into the crudest traps (apending unfortunately for much more... subtle ones to seduce "the elected officials themselves, if they could") is provided to us - already - by an editorial by Abbé Richard paied in the Catholic newspaper L'Homme Nouveau of January 16, 1977.
Alluding to the books of Jean-Claude Bourret, in which the events of Fatima were discussed, accommodated to the "soucoupiste" sauce, the abbot, although very reluctant towards the interpretation of the famous television journalist, nevertheless stated: "It is quite unexpected, but all in all satisfying, that the appearances of the Cova da Iria, despised by many of our Catholic scribes, as phenomena of a charismatic and miraculous order, can begin a brilliant career as flying saucers or extra-terrestrials. Grace takes all the paths, as Péguy would say."
Can we be more blind?...
And we do not even dare to imagine what this ecclesiastical pious could say today, at a time when "oppose" already behind the scenes, for the dress rehearsal of a revised and corrected Harmaguedon, the Great Blonds (future "angels of light") and the Little Greys-Reptilians-Insectoides (who as "demons" do not even play a compositional role, on the sole condition - but decisive! - to get them out of the Well of the apocalyptic Abyss, and not "descent" from distant planets...)
This tragic illusion of wanting to "lunch with the devil" unconsciously was further illustrated by a broadcast by the radio station Ici et maintenant, mentioned on this forum on August 22, and which, while properly assimilating the appearances of Fatima to a "ufological" demonstration ("soucoupiste" for Francophones...), qualified the third secret as unspeakable and abject!
Because you have understood, the Church hides from us the truth about extraterrestrials, as it hides it from us on the "Lineage" of the "sacred blood"...
Close close this tragicomic parenthesis in the hope of having been heard.
To finish convincing us that the "great monarchy", "neo-gnostic" or fundamentalist, is indeed a two-headed hydra, and that in this diabolical chess game, it is ultimately a question of sacrificing the Queen (in this case: the Great Prostitute) for the benefit of the Antichrist, we will abandon the black legend for true History, which is just as sinister.
Perhaps we will even judge that, here too, reality goes beyond "fiction".
One fine day of the year of grace 1772, a certain Loiseaut, a bourgeois of Saint-Mandé, near Paris, suddenly noticed the presence at his side, while he prayed in church, of a very singular character with a dark complexion, abundant hairiness, and whose neck was barred with a horrible red scar...
Wondering that no one else but him had apparently noticed this funny parishioner, Loiseaut returned home, in the grip of a disorder that gave way to an understandable stupor, when in front of his door, he fell nose to nose with the stranger who was waiting for him... and who fainted in the air when he was going to question him.
It was too much for Loiseaut, forced to bed. Around midnight, the room suddenly lights up with a reddish light and the head of the man with the scar appears, surrounded by a bloody halo. Opening a mouth distorted by hatred, she blurts out in a strangled and whistling voice: "I am waiting for the heads of the kings and those of the courtesans of the kings."
After a few days of rest and care, Loiseaut, trying to forget what he holds for a hallucination, returns to his Parisian business. As he crosses Louis XV Square, a beggar solicits him. Loiseaut, without looking at him, pulls out of his pocket a piece naturally struck with the effigy of the sovereign, which he throws into the hat of the wretch:
"Thank you," said the latter, "it's a king's head, but here," he adds, pointing with his hand to the center of the square, "he'll fall another one, and that's the one I'm waiting for."
Loiseaut, bewildered, suddenly turns his eyes to the beggar: he is the mysterious stranger with the red scar!
On January 21, 1793, on this same square - which has meanwhile become Place de la Révolution, and which is now called Place de la Concorde - while the cleaver of the guillotine had just cut off the head of Louis XVI, a dark-skinned man, with a long beard, climbs on the scaffolding, dips his hands in the royal blood and shakes them on the spectators of the execution: "French people, I baptize you in the name of "Jacques" and freedom!"
Some understood that this "jacques" was the last great master of the Templars, Jacques de Molay, whose Power of Darkness was thus trying to appropriate martyrdom, to make it a weapon against royalty in the name, undoubtedly, of collective "responsibility"...
Loiseaut, who died a few years earlier, had not been able to attend the scene, but before this sinister "apotheosis", he had unfortunately fallen into the rests of the "apparition", which pretended to be John the Baptist the Precursor, and predicted divine punishments called by the sins of men - among which it was obviously necessary to count those of an unworthy royalty and therefore... usurpative. Already!
We will find this climate imbated with sweetness and charity (!) in the imprecations of Léon Bloy, who also aimed at the clergy, as it should be. Taking the two seers of the Salette for the two Witnesses of the Apocalypse, he wrote for example in The One who cries (hear: the appearance of the Salette in 1846):
"When the muddy France from head to toe," said Melanie [the shepherdess of the Salette], has been purified by the scourges of divine justice, God will give her a man, but a free man to govern her. It will then be relaxed, almost annihilated."
"It would be necessary to benefit from a rare stupidity to look for this man among the cattle of pilgrimage, or of the Catholic congress," added the "ungrateful begar", very disatisfied that in terms of pilgrimage, precisely, we neglected the Salette, allegedly victim of a conspiracy of silence, for the benefit, for example, of Lourdes. He who did not hide from preferring the appearance "crowned with thorns" to the Immaculate Conception "crowned with roses, white and blue in the suave music and perfumes."
Let's say it in passing, Bloy will not forgive Huysmans - he even dared to see it as the cause of his death - this involuntarily "symbolic" description of the Salette:
"The landscape was sinister; we felt an extraordinary discomfort at contemplating it, perhaps because it confused this idea of the infinite that is in us. The firmament was only a relegated accessory, such as a scrap, on the abandoned summit of the mountains and the abyss became everything. It diminished, it reduced the sky, substituting the splendors of eternal spaces with the magnificence of its chasms.
"And indeed, the eye turned away, disappointed, from this sky that had lost the unlimited of its depths, the immeasurable of its expanses [...]
"Involuntarily the gaze was attracted by the precipices and then the head faltered to scrutinize these disproportionate holes at night. Thus moved, removed from above and carried down, this immensity was horrible!"
(The Cathedral.)
But let's take up the thread of our story, inaugurated - you said weird?... - by this pseudo-"appearance" of the Precursor, terrible and threatening enough to delight Bloy's heart, if he had been in Loiseaut's place...
Around the latter had been formed, under the name of "Société de Saint John the Baptist", an association of pious people who collected the warnings of the "Precursor" every day.
Present at all sessions, but only visible to Loisealt, he dictated prayers and revealed God's designs. After Loiseaut's death, a priest entertained the prophetic flame for some time, before the wife of a member of the Society, Françoise André (1730-1803), in turn received the "heavenly" favors.
On the day of Saint Louis, August 25, 1788, the Precursor appeared to him, and from then on he taught the seer (itherally illiterate, but who dictated her revelations) the means of earning Divine Mercy, while announcing the next reign of the Holy Spirit.
At the death of "Sister Françoise", another member of the Society, Legros, received the spirit of prophecy, which ordered him to build a temple for the new Church, rue Basse-Saint-Pierre-au-Marais (the well-named one!).
Invested in a kind of priestly ministry on which he was discreet, Mr. Legros nevertheless sought, by a dark irony, a job in the royal house of the fools of Charenton.
We do not know if he acted in this case under the inspiration of Jean-Baptiste (let's say more precisely: the diabolical appearance), but it is there in any case that he met another major protagonist of this underground history: Thomas Martin, a beautiful peasant from Gallardon, whom Duke Decazes, Minister of the Police, had just interned, although in the general opinion he showed no sign of imbalance.
It is that Martin had also been gratified, in 1816, with appearances, not of "Saint John the Baptist" but of the archangel Raphael, dressed in a fedgote and a top hat..." Brighter than the sun's rays", notwithstanding his bourgeois outfit (the devil can never help but be grotesque!), he had delivered to our peasant - before rising from the ground and also disappearing "as if he had melted" in the air - this message intended for Louis XVIII: The king "occupied a place to which he was not entitled."
In other words, the Dauphin, son of Louis XVI, had not died in the Temple prison, and was therefore the only legitimate sovereign.
The essential Marquis of the Frank, whom all these singularities did not put off, even seriously specifies that the envoy of God - Martin - "added to the sovereign that if he were consecrated, he would be struck during the ceremony... and the usurper Monarch did not dare to expose himself to divine sanction".
(The sacred and divine nature of royalty in France)
On this theme of survival (bis repetita placent: there is no pure chemically error, etc.) many variations have been embroidered since then, neglecting the legitimate lineage more and more - just as the Sedevacantists have "deposed" the Pope - to better listen to the "Voice from below" bloyen.
In any case, the strongest is that Martin de Gallardon was able to personally make this "heavenly" commission to his royal recipient, who out of curiosity had taken him out of Charenton to be able to hear him and, without resentment, granted him freedom after receiving him in audience.
The arrival in France of Naundorf, the most famous of the false Dolphins, seventeen years later, aroused a stir in Martin that would share once again, in his time, the incorrigible Bloy:
"The Dauphin, son of Louis XVI, - authentically Louis XVII, - allegedly dead at the Temple, in 1795, exhaled his painful soul in Delft, Holland, on August 10, 1845, a little more than thirteen months before the appearance of the Salette."
And to quote himself (The Son of Louis XVI):
"very singular promptitude of this miracle, so soon after the Candleslaber with Golden Lilies, of which it is spoken of in the Pentateuch, had been overthrown.
"When the news of the apparition broke out, did a single Christian wonder if something infinitely precious had not just been broken, so that the Splendor itself, the impassive and inaccessible Glory appeared in mourning? [...]
"The catastrophe is so huge that what absolutely cannot suffer nevertheless suffers and cries. Bliss sobs and begs. The Almighty declares that it can no longer take it and asks for mercy... So what happened except that Someone died who was not supposed to die?..."
This "Someone", in this case Naundorf, had once drawn from his meeting with Martin de Gallardon a new faith in his destiny and, a mystified mystifier, he then sank into a hallucinated messianism, whose dark flame was daily maintained by three particularly talkative characters: Elijah, Raphael and John the Baptist, who dictated to him a book in which his mission was exposed: to restore the truth and justice of God on earth, his life having to "equalize that of the Lord Jesus Christ".
We will be forgiven here a digression that will perhaps broaden the horizon of some: we cannot help but put this "grand-monarchist" madness in opposition, among others, with Shinto wisdom which, in the same context of sacralization of temporal power, knew how to avoid excesses by symbolically marking the distinction between the human and the Divine.
The mirror (kagami) is the first and most important of the "Three Jewels" (the other two being the Sword and the Necklace of 500 pearls) that were given by the goddess Amaterasu to the legendary ancestor of the sovereigns of Japan, and whose possession testifies to the half-divine status of the emperor. But precisely, this theophanic mirror through which Amaterasu revealed himself to the gods, and in which, following the grandson of the goddess, the emperors are called "ontologically" to contemplate their divine Self, was enveloped in successive veils.
As if the mikado should not appropriate, in the name of its only temporal function, this symbol of Supreme Knowledge - the other two jewels, Sword and Necklace, being respectively associated with the virtues of bravery and charity. The Emperor of Japan, too, therefore recognized himself as a lieutenant.
And very significantly, the only attempt to unveil the mirror, interrupted by a miracle, at the end of the 10th century, was the work of Emperor Reizei Tennô, who was crazy and had to abdicate immediately after his accession to the throne.
But unfortunately we need to find other "fools", even if Martin de Gallardon's internment in Charenton was, as we have seen, essentially "political"...
When, in November 1833, the Beauceron peasant recognized in Naundorf the "legitimate prince", Legros had been dead for a year, but the teachings of the Society of Saint Jean-Baptiste were perpetuated by an Avignonnaise, Mrs. Bouche - born Marguerite-Thérèse des Isnard - who had been predicting since September 1810, a time when she had received revelations in the Saint-Pierre church in Avignon similar to those of Loiseaut, Sister Françoise and Legros.
Having adopted the nomen mysticum of "Sister Salomé", she undertook, at the injunction of the "Spirit", to inform the drivers of the peoples of her "Work of Mercy".
After unsuccessful attempts with Napoleon and then Louis XVIII, she managed to impress the Emperor of Russia, who brought her to the Court.
She persuaded him to seal an alliance with Louis XVIII on the basis of his revelations, before being eclipsed in the spring of 1821 by another enlightened Mrs. de Krudener.
Back in Paris, Sister Salomé supported the cause of Naundorf and, through him, met Martin de Gallardon and the Society of Saint-Jean-Baptiste.
The "prophetic chain" inaugurated in 1772 had therefore not been broken, and it seems that one character, in particular, played a decisive role in the perpetuation of this political-mystical current: Ferdinand Geoffroi, originally from Poitiers, former notary convicted of embezzlement of funds.
A very active Naundorfist in the Southwest, he also knew Mrs. Bouche, alias Sister Salomé, for a long time, to whom the Spirit once announced:
"Now, rest, another will succeed you in this same ministry."
This other, precisely, Geoffroi also knew him: In 1838, he had met Eugène Vintras, with a heavy past as a gyrovague crook, with whom he partnered for the operation of a business firm in Caen. But Vintras, apparently not very good at this activity or required by higher tasks, moved to Tilly-sur-Seulles in early 1839 as the manager of a cardboard factory.
Ferdinand Geoffroi did not abandon his ex-associate, whom he paid frequent visits, and whom he finally joined in Tilly.
Everything was therefore in place for the new "revelation" which, in line with the apparitions of Saint John the Baptist in Loiseaut, would stage the prophet Elijah, whose "spirit" seized Vintras.
The latter's mission was first announced to him on August 6, 1839 by a disheared old man who, like the Baptist and the archangel Raphael, evaporated into the azure after delivering his message.
On the 20th of the same month, Geoffroi presented Vintras to Mrs. Bouche who recognized in him the follower announced by Heaven, and transmitted his powers to him.
The case then entered its decisive phase: The archangel Saint Michael, Jesus, Mary, Saint Joseph, soon replaced the Old Man. They duly denounced the state of the Church and prophesied purifying punishments, followed by abundant consolations accompanying the reign of the Holy Spirit. In a regenerated society there would be only one herd under a single pastor:
"A Holy Pontiff and a strong Monarch, both according to the heart of God will restore everything."
Known air...
After five years' imprisonment for fraud (which made him a martyr in the eyes of his disciples), Vintras, alias Élie redivivus, received from Christ himself the ritual of the renovated worship, and the precise description of the priestly ornaments that the "pontifed'amour" of the "carmel" was to wear: On a red chasuble hung, front and behind, an overturned cross (like the one that supports a statue of the Virgin in front of the church of Rennes-le Château) of a darker red.
This cross was supposed to symbolize the end of the reign of the suffering Christ and the advent of the glorious Christ.
As for the ritual, it was modeled on the Catholic Mass, with a few variations. Because in the minds of the faithful, it was by no means a new religion, not even a reform.
According to Abbé Charvoz, one of the disciples of the priests of Vintras, the Work of Mercy (inherited from Mrs. Bouche), "is the Christian religion, pure and simple, but integral (here, here!), the only, the only, that of Jesus Christ, embracing all that he taught, without fraud, without false interpretation, full of grace and truth as its author."
The liturgy was accompanied by supernatural phenomena considered miraculous, in the first place appearances, disappearances and multiplications of bloody and variously ornate hosts, which were explained as follows: These were hosts stolen by Satanists who wanted to profane them, and who had escaped them to seek asylum and reparation within the work of Mercy...
Caressed in turn by the wing of the fallen Archangel, three priests, the Baillard brothers, new pontiffs of the Vintrasian Carmel, blew this bizarre spirit on the Lorraine hill of Sion-Vaudémont, sung by Maurice Barrès in his famous inspired Hill, and which we did not fail to symbolically compare with another hill: that of Rennes-le-Château.
On a gloomy day of winter 1851, Vintras himself, Barrès tells us, came to resound his prophetic verb:
"... Since we have returned to Zion, the streets of the villages have been weeping; indescribable moans descend from the hill, on which the Lord sends me to cry to the cities and countryside of the East: "Withdrow from the number of worshipers who offer divine incense to the colossus of domination, stop giving yourself to the great prostitute, to Roman Babylon..."
In the night that followed, Vintras, a virulent sedevacantist, as we can see, was delighted in ecstasy and attended a divine council where the fate of the earth was played, for which he interceded: "- I will keep those who really honor me, replied the Most High [...]"
And he explained to the Organ (as he called himself Vintras) what the new mass was supposed to be: "It is now up to humanity to take the place of the divine Sacrificed; it is up to men to become victims, to offer themselves whole, to annihilate themselves. Humanity is the new Christ. Jesus will finally enter his rest."
This singular theology calls for some comments:
If Christ "entered his rest", what about his glorious return?
And it was no less worrying to see humanity take its place (its "deification" having since known the "ideological" success we know.)
As for this sacrificial vocation, and even worse, this "annihilation" of said humanity, substituted for the Redeemer, they opened the way to all the deviations to which the doctrine of the reversibility of merit is susceptible.
Perfectly orthodox in itself, this, since it concerns not only the communion of the saints stricto sensu but the interactions governing the spiritual destiny of all humanity, can have two antinomic aspects: the luminous face is identified with Catholicity and therefore with our assumption in the mystical body of the new Adam, of whom we are the adoptive brothers, and thus co-heirs of the Kingdom of God.
And the Mother who begots us to this heavenly glory is none other than the "Woman wrapped in the sun, and the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars. And she is pregnant, and she screams in the pain and torture of childbirth." (Apocalypse, 12, 1-2)
The universality of her maternal love is attested by all true believers, under whatever name they pray to it: the Shekinah for the Jews, Maryam for the Muslims ("O Maryam, in truth Allah chose you, purified you and preferred you to the women of the worlds." [Quran, 3, 42.] To speak only of the "Abrahamic religions".
As for the dark side of this reversibility of merits, it arises very logically when it is no longer a question of completing what is missing in the Passion of a Christ now absent, when it is no longer a question of the mystical body of the Savior that humanity, according to Vintras... and many others after him, must replace.
What, under these conditions, can this anni-erchisation required of said humanity lead to? Not on the rejection of the "old man" in favor of the "new man" conformed to his divine Model.
No more on the fulfillment of the Gospel word: "Truly I tell you, insofar as you did it to one of these smallest of my brothers, it is to Me that you did it." (Saint Matthew, 10, 40; 18, 5; 25, 40.)
Because outside the Verb, there is no longer a neighbor or a close relationship, but only a juxtaposition of disinherited individuals constituting the "mystical body" of the fallen Adam and participating ipso facto in the fall.
Paul Claudel, victim of a strange (or significant?) blindly, tragically confused the communion of souls and the false solidarity born of the only interests and material needs, of which the current world offers us the true image: that of the struggle of all against all.
Since we can never remember enough, with for example Saint Thomas Aquinas, that matter is a principle of division.
How appalling, therefore, this exaltation by Claudel of international trade (!) leading to the "prophetic" vision of the too famous "planetary village"
(Cf. Conversation in the Loir-et-Cher, in Nicolas Mulot, La Reversibilité).
Astrophysicist Jean-Pierre Luminet draws the consequences of this confusion of genders by stating in an interview that "with the Internet this famous planetary consciousness so advocated by precursors like Teilhard de Chardin, becomes palpable. In the cyberworld, the notion of a foreigner does not exist." (Cited by N. Mule, op.cit.)
Involuntarily ironic observation to the extent that, in reality, everyone has become a stranger to themselves!
By wanting to "Christianize" globalization and then the cyberworld as Abbé Richard wanted to "Christianize" the appearances of UFOs, we are actually working on the "spiritual animation" of the reign of the Great Prostitute, she who intoxicates the merchants of the land and whose future ephemeral kingdom can already be guessed behind this ploutocratic tyranny in which "interconnected" ants" are frantically agitated... but ignorant of the formidable "pasasps" that begin to come out of the Well of the Abyss!
Therefore, what does this caricature of "horizontalized" communion of the saints look like, for which the forgetting of transcendence metamorphoses the reversibility of merits into a kind of barter of vices and virtues, if not to a herd terrified by all the imaginable - and even unimaginable - cataclysms inherent in the end of a world, and who, believing to ensure his salvation, will sacrifice himself "whole", body and soul (the mind remaining inaccessible), for the benefit of the "federator", the catalyst of these now unleashed chaotic influences, in a word of the anti-Christian speaker of this "Voice of the Bottom" that Léon Bloy took for oracular, and Who claims to oppose the Verb.
We will find in La Reversibilité, by Nicolas Mulot, curious information on this kind of "Christian Nietzscheism" susceptible of course to several degrees and which, through a strange "suspension of ethics" borrowed from Kierkegaard - which in this case would not lead beyond but below Christian morality - "doctrinally prepares" to this collective suicide disguised as an expiatory sacrifice.
Since, in the diabolical inspirations, the grotesque and the sordid always dispute the terrifying, a "dissident" disciple of Vintras, Abbé Jean-Antoine Boullan (1824-1893) - who wanted to "exorcise the Church" - took charge of caricaturing... the caricature, by explicitly placing his "mission" under the sign of the Great Prostitute, while Vintras was preparing, at his level, the advent of the Antichrist.
From the meeting of Abbé Boullan, in La Salette, in 1856, with Adèle Chevalier, a "miraculous" and "inspired" nun, was born "The Work of the Reparation of Souls", where, through "mystical marriages", which had "mystical" only the name, was somehow pushed to its ultimate "pornographic-scatological" consequences the doctrine of the "holiness of sin" advocated by the two false messiahs of Judaism, Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank, which was discussed here, and who outraged the face of the Shekinah as Boullan insulted that of the Virgin.
Obviously condemned by Rome and even imprisoned, Boullan left the Church and went to Lyon to Vintras, whose succession he had to claim at his death in 1875, despite the opposition of a majority of Vintrasians who considered him... as heretic!
But it is time, precisely, to find Vintras, even as he descends from the hill of Sion, a kind of black Sinai where the "rest" of Christ was revealed to this new Moses, in other words the end of his reign...
To the Baillard brothers who accompany him, he announces their upcoming excommunication by the pope. It did not take long, and it was the decay for the lost priests, before Leopold, the eldest, intoned a vengeful Gloria ins excelsis during the debacle of 1870, which he attended as in the long-awaited divine Punishment. A "divine surprise" before the time...
Since seventy years later, and whether it was the Second or the Third Reich, it was always the terrible shadow of the Holy Empire that extended over martyred France. And if the Bismarckian Reich was proclaimed in 1871 in the Hall of Mirrors of the Palace of Versailles, how can we not see it as a tragic... mirror game, where the perverted Imperium was reflected in the monarchist "hubris" of the "Sun King"...
The hussars of death parading to the sound of the fifes in the Lorraine villages announced, in the eyes of Léopold Baillard, the final triumph of the Vintrasians. Already, under the rigors of foreign occupation, trembled for the humble, freed from state constraints, something that resembled the false freedom of chaos. To hinder these dark forces, invisible cohorts of the "Empire of Evil", appeared the Queen, she who must crush the Dragon's head.
It was at the heart of the terrible winter of 1871, January 17 (symbolic date when the spatio-temporal doors of the year open, for better or for worse, and in fact omnipresent in the legend of Rennes-le Château and in the Parisian sanctuary of Saint-Sulpice - essential milestones of the meridian red line and "splines" on which the said doors pivot...)
In the village of Pontmain, 60 kilometers from Laval, the crowned Virgin, but wearing a black veil, showed herself in the icy night sown with countless stars, to children around whom a kneeling population gathered.
She thus responded to the exhortation of the Lady, slowly inscribed in gold letters, by an invisible hand, on a large white banner:
"BUT PRAY MY CHILDREN. GOD WILL GO YOU IN A SHORT TIME ●
"MY SON LETS HIMSELF BE TOUCHED"
The message, punctuated after the word TIME, with a large golden ring, like a sun, as big as the letters, included 70 signs, and was delivered to 70 poor peasants; but only children could read it.
The Virgin had stayed three and a half hours in the night of Pontmain, to remind us of the protection she will exercise during the three and a half years of the reign of the Antichrist.
And to foreshadow this protection, an incredible order ordered the Prussians to stop their irresistible momentum. They did not enter Laval and a few days later, the armistice was signed.
That same evening of January 17, 1871, when the Virgin appeared in Pontmain, a solemn novena began in Paris, in the church of Notre-Dame des Victoires.
An inspiration had prompted a vicar to offer the gathered faithful a wish that they accepted on the spot:
"A heart of silver will teach future generations that today between 8 and 9 o'clock, a people has prostrated itself at the feet of Notre-Dame des Victoires and has been saved by her."
Regnum Galliae, Regum Mariae...
After three long years, the Prussians left and France was raised by a wave of fervor as commented by the inevitable Léon Bloy, redoubling sarcasm against the Catholics:
"Ah! I remember these crowds, in the aftermath of the war, in 73 exactly.
"The backs were still cooking from the German boot. We were only talking about returning to God. We piled up in Catholic circles to hear the good words of Bishop Mermillod [bishop of Geneva involved in economic and social problems], telling what he had suffered for Jesus Christ or the ecumenical babblings of M. de Mun [founder of the work of the working circles]. We clung madly to the Count of Chambord supposed the great Monarch announced by prophecies and whose illegitimate bedaine had to save everything."
(It is that Maximin, the seer of the Salette, had made the journey of Frohsdorf to incite the prince in exile to renounce the throne.
"Everything suggests, indeed," writes Bloy, "that Maximin would have said to this pretender what Martin de Gallardon, in 1816, had said to the infamous Louis XVIII: "You are a usurper.")
"We rushed to the pilgrimages," continues Bloy, singing liberating verses. We voted for the erection of a sanctuary in the Sacred Heart [...] What else? The Augustinian Fathers of the Assomption founded the prosperous Pilgrim and the profitable Cross, for the irremediable debatement of Christian thought and feeling."
(The one who cries.)
All this, let's repeat, because we had neglected, in his eyes, the Salette and the "great-monarchist" messages and other "secrets" of the seers... What could have been the reaction of Bloy and the Vintrasians, 70 years later, when they learned that some Nazis intended to replace Marshal Pétain at the head of France with a descendant of Naundorf?...
Always the villainous relations between the Kingdom denying its true King, and the Reich, antithesis of the perennial Imperium and ultimately devolved to this Antichrist of which Hitler was a precursor.
He did not confide in Hans Grimm, five years before his seizure of power: "I know that Someone must appear, and face our situation. I looked for this man. I could not discover it anywhere, and that is why I got up, in order to accomplish the preparatory task, only the urgent preparatory task, because I know that I am not the One who must come. And I also know what I miss. But the Other remains absent, and no one is there, and there is no more time to waste."
It is not until the mysteries of the Razès - foundation of the French sacred geography and alchemical crucible of "hiero-history" - which had not been forcibly integrated into the Nazi black legend, through the tightrope walker Otto Rahn and his alleged "graal" research, which must have been significantly equivalent, by their lack of seriousness, to those which, in the same place, today have the Ark of the Covenant as their object!
And yet, when we abandon the distorting mirrors of a nightmare Luna Park, to confront an unspeakable reality, we realize that the red thread of the Paris meridian, some of which would like to make the Red Dragon of the Apocalypse, is none other than a figure of the Tree of Life, the Cosmic Pillar proper to all religions, of the Middle Column of the Jewish tradition, at the bottom of which rests the Shethiyah Stone, the fundamental Stone which is also the Philosopher's Stone in which the transmutation of which the African masters of Fire participate.
The axis we are talking about is also, of course, the Spear of the Grail, completed by the cup filled with the drink of immortality, and by the stone - always the stone... - in which it is cut, and which sometimes synthesizes its attributes. It is still in Shintoism, the sacred spear, stuck in the center of the island of Onogoro, formed by the coagulation of a drop that fell from this heavenly spear that Izanagi and Izanami - the primordial couple - had soaked in the Waters and around which their propitiatory circumambulations gave birth to beings and worlds.
Finally, among the North American Indians, it is the sacred Tree of the sacrificial "dance of the sun", during which the participants offer the Great Spirit their body and soul for all men.
Creation in the Far East, redemption in the Far West. In the middle, where the "four paths of the mystery" intersect, the Precursor, the 515, will bring together to offer them to the glorious Christ "the many peoples who are still standing".
This is the true mission of France, and the time has come to understand the message of Pontmain, whose 70 signs constitute this seven-year decuple so frequent in the Bible, and of which Saint Augustine reminds us that it implies the idea of totalization and completion of a cycle.
It also indicates universality, as in chapter 10 of Genesis, which lists the 70 peoples of the earth scattered after the episode of the Tower of Babel, and who were in Pontmain symbolically represented by the 70 poor gathered who believed without having seen, praying in the face of the night sky on which the midnight sun, the Sol Invictus adorning the banner of the apparition, virtually abolished time to already illuminate eternity.
Origenius